EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-652/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2024 - Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO - MHCS (Shade of the colour orange)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0652

62022TA0652

March 6, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2759

29.4.2024

(Case T-652/22)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU trade mark consisting in a shade of orange - Absolute ground for invalidity - Graphic representation that is sufficiently clear and precise - Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(C/2024/2759)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz, K. Wagner and A. Wrage, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MHCS (Épernay, France) (represented by: O. Vrins, B. Raus and N. Clarembeaux, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2022 (Case R 118/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2022 (Case R 118/2022-4);

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders EUIPO, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal;

4.Declares that MHCS is to bear its own costs.

*

Language of the case: English

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2759/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(C/2024/2759)

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia