I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-612/11) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/63)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: Treofan Holdings GmbH (Raunheim, Germany), Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG (Neunkirchen, Germany) (represented by: J de Weerth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)
Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action;
2.The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Treofan Holdings GmbH and Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG;
3.The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.