EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-205/22: Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2024 – Naass and Sea-Watch v Frontex

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0205

62022TA0205

April 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3606

17.6.2024

(Case T-205/22)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to an aerial surveillance operation carried out by Frontex in the Central Mediterranean Sea on 30 July 2021 - Refusal to grant access - Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security - Obligation to state reasons)

(C/2024/3606)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Marie Naass (Berlin, Germany), Sea-Watch eV (Berlin) (represented by: I. Van Damme and A. Matthaiou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (represented by: R.-A. Popa and H. Caniard, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Decision DGSC/TO/PAD-2021-00350 of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) of 7 February 2022 concerning a confirmatory application for access to documents.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Orders that Decision DGSC/TO/PAD-2021-00350 of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) of 7 February 2022 be annulled in so far as it refused access to ‘all pictures and videos related to the aerial operation in the Central Mediterranean Sea on 30 July 2021’.

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders Ms Marie Naass and Sea-Watch eV to bear, in addition to their own costs, half of Frontex’s costs.

4.Orders Frontex to pay half of its own costs.

*

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3606/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia