EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-132/25, M.M. Ristorazione: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 10 February 2025 – M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0132

62025CN0132

February 10, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/2365

28.4.2025

(C/2025/2365)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: M.M. Ristorazione Srl

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Villa Ramazzini Srl

Question referred

Must Article 9(5) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law, namely Article 132(4) of Decreto legislativo del 10 febbraio 2005, n. 30 – Codice della proprietà industriale (Legislative Decree No 30 of 10 February 2005 – Italian Industrial Property Code), as amended, under which the requirement for the protective measure to cease to have effect in the event of failure to institute the substantive proceedings within a mandatory time limit, contained in Article 132(3) of the Italian Industrial Property Code, does not apply to interim measures issued pursuant to Article 700 of the codice di procedura civile (Italian Code of Civil Procedure) and to other protective measures capable of anticipating the effects of the judgment on the substance, even though, in such cases, either party may institute the substantive proceedings?

(1) OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2365/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia