I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 246/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Conlance GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Hayn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea)
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark SONANCE — Application for registration No 14 589 907
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2019 in Case R 1085/2018-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 15 May 2018 in Case No B 2 660 572‘Conlance GmbH v LG ELECTRONICS INC.’;
—uphold Opposition Case No B 2 660 572‘Conlance GmbH v LG ELECTRONICS INC.’ for all the contested goods;
—reject the EU trade mark application ‘SONANCE’, No UM 14 589 907;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
In the event that another party is intervening in support of the defendant:
—order the other party to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.