EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-174/19 P and C-175/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 — Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, Föreningen Svensk Sjöfart, Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) eV (C-174/19 P), Stena Line Scandinavia AB v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, Föreningen Svensk Sjöfart (C-175/19 P) (Appeal — Action for annulment — State aid — Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link — Individual aid — Notified aid declared compatible with the internal market — Execution of an important project of common European interest — Decision not to raise any objections — Monopoly — Distortion of competition and effect on trade)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0174

62019CA0174

October 6, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.11.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/7

(Joined Cases C-174/19 P and C-175/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - State aid - Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link - Individual aid - Notified aid declared compatible with the internal market - Execution of an important project of common European interest - Decision not to raise any objections - Monopoly - Distortion of competition and effect on trade)

(2021/C 481/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

(Case C-174/19 P)

Appellants: Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, S. Noë and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by J. Nymann-Lindegren, and subsequently by V. Jørgensen, acting as Agents, and R. Holdgaard, advokat), Föreningen Svensk Sjöfart (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, abogado), Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) eV (represented by: T. Hohmuth, Rechtsanwalt, and L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat)

Interveners in support of the appellants: Aktionsbündnis gegen eine feste Fehmarnbeltquerung eV (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and W. Mecklenburg, Rechtsanwalt), Rederi Nordö-Link AB (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch and A. Godsk Fallesen, advokater), Trelleborg Hamn AB (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and J.L. Buendía Sierra, abogado)

(Case C-175/19 P)

Appellant: Stena Line Scandinavia AB (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and P. Alexiadis, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, S. Noë and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by J. Nymann-Lindegren, and subsequently by V. Jørgensen, acting as Agents, and by R. Holdgaard, advokat), Föreningen Svensk Sjöfart (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, abogado)

Interveners in support of the appellant: Aktionsbündnis gegen eine feste Fehmarnbeltquerung eV (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and W. Mecklenburg, Rechtsanwalt), Rederi Nordö-Link AB (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch and A. Godsk Fallesen, advokater), Trelleborg Hamn AB (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and J.L. Buendía Sierra, abogado)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the main appeals and the cross-appeals;

2.Orders Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH and Stena Line Scandinavia AB to pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission in connection with the main appeals;

3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs in connection with the cross-appeals;

4.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, Föreningen Svensk Sjöfart and Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) eV to bear their own costs;

5.Orders Nordö-Link AB, Trelleborg Hamn AB and Aktionsbündnis gegen eine feste Fehmarnbeltquerung eV to bear their own costs.

*

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia