I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-234/07) (1)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Dutch beer market - Decision finding a single and continuous infringement of Article 81 EC - Applicant found to have participated in the infringement - Insufficient evidence - No proper statement of reasons)
2011/C 311/57
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Koninklijke Grolsch NV (Enschede, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Biesheuvel and J. de Pree, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, A. Bouquet, S. Noë and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and, subsequently, A. Bouquet and S Noë, assisted by M. Slotboom, lawyer)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case No COMP/B-2/37.766 — Dutch beer market) in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, application for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.
The Court:
1.Annuls Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case No COMP/B-2/37.766 –Dutch beer market) in so far as it concerns Koninklijke Grolsch NV;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.