EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-794/18 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0794
62018CN0794
December 17, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.5.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 182/3
—
(Case C-794/18 P)
(2019/C 182/04)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA)
By order of 11 April 2019, the Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.