EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-398/23, PT II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 June 2023 — Criminal proceedings against PT

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0398

62023CN0398

June 29, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/116

16.10.2023

(Case C-398/23, PT II)

(C/2023/116)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Defendant

Questions referred

Is a national law which stipulates that the co-defendants and their defence counsel must give their consent in order for an agreement discontinuing criminal proceedings against a defendant to receive approval when those proceedings are at the trial stage, but under which such consent is not required when those proceedings are at the pre-trial stage, compatible with Article 4(1) and Article 5 of Framework Decision 2004/757 (1) and Article 4 of Framework Decision 2008/841, (2) read in conjunction with Article 20 of the Charter?

Is a national law that limits the possibility for a defendant to have the court examine the substance of an agreement he or she has entered into (under which he or she is to receive a more lenient penalty) — that limitation consisting of a requirement for the consent of the co-defendants to be obtained — compatible with Article 4(1) of Framework Decision 2004/757, read in conjunction with Articles 48(2) and 52(1) of the Charter?

Is a national law that provides for that limitation also as a consequence of providing the defendant with detailed information on the accusation compatible with Article 6(3), read in conjunction with Article 6(1) of Directive 2012/13 (3) and in conjunction with Articles 47(1) and 52(1) of the Charter?

Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA of 25 October 2004 laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking (OJ 2004 L 335, p. 8)

Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ 2008 L 300, p. 42).

Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/116/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Bulgarian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia