- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-448/22: Action brought on 20 July 2022 — PW v EEAS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0448
62022TN0448
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.10.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 380/18
(Case T-448/22)
(2022/C 380/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: PW (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the implicit decision of the defendant dated 30 July 2021 refusing to correct the calculation of the reimbursement of his annual travel expenses for 2020 as regards his children and, in as far as necessary, the annulment of the decision of the defendant, dated 14 April 2022, rejecting his complaint filed on 28 October 2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations; and,
—order the defendant to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and a breach of the principle of good administration.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.