I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-631/22) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 112/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Beijing Unicorn Technology Co. Ltd (Beijing, China) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and S. Clotten, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: WD Plus GmbH (Hannover, Germany)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 July 2022 (Case R 246/2022-2).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Beijing Unicorn Technology Co. Ltd shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 463, 5.12.2022.