- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-236/24: Action brought on 6 May 2024 – Ponsatí i Obiols v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0236
62024TN0236
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3791
(Case T-236/24)
(C/2024/3791)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Clara Ponsatí i Obiols (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented by: G. Boye and S. Bekaert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024 declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities of Ms Ponsatí pursuant to Article 9 (1)(a)and (2) of Protocol No 7 announced in the Parliament on 29 March 2023 (2023/2039(IMM)) and 11 September 2023 (2023/2191(IMM));
—Order the defendant to pay all costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024 declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities announced in the Parliament on 29 March and 11 September 2023 infringed Rules 9(4) and (9) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, as well as Articles 39(2) and 41(1) of the Charter, in connection with Articles 232 and 343 TFEU and Article 9 of Protocol No 7, as they were adopted by an incompetent body within the Parliament.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024, declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities announced in the Parliament on 29 March and 11 September 2023, infringed Rules 7(3) and 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, as well as Articles 39(2) and 41(1) and (2) of the Charter, in connection with Articles 232 and 343 TFEU and Article 9 of Protocol No 7, as Rule 7(3) was not applicable to those requests and therefore the applicant was unlawfully deprived of her rights in those immunity procedures.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3791/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—