- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-766/19: Order of the Court of 10 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Generalised malfunction in an airport’s refuelling system)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CB0766
62019CB0766
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 287/24
(Case C-766/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Scope - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Generalised malfunction in an airport’s refuelling system)
(2020/C 287/36)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: QE, RD
Defendant: SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA
Other party: ANA — Aeroportos de Portugal SA
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (District Court, Azores, Portugal), by decision of 8 July 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*) Language of the case: Portuguese.
* * *
(2020/C 287/36)