I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-517/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Final report of the OLAF investigation into the implementation of a street-lighting investment project in Hungary - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual - Protection of personal data)
(2021/C 422/15)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Andrea Homoki (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: T. Hüttl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Béres and A. Spina, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 22 May 2019 rejecting a confirmatory application for access to documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
The Court:
1.Annuls Decision No OCM(2019)11506 of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 22 May 2019, in so far as it refused to grant access to the final report of the OLAF investigation in Case No OF/2015/0034/B4, with any personal data concerning witnesses, internal notes and references to OLAF’s methods redacted;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
* * *
Language of the case: Hungarian.