EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-625/23, Società agricola Circe: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 12 October 2023 — Società agricola Circe di OL società semplice v ST, in his own name and as owner of the sole proprietorship Agricola Case Rosse di ST, Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0625

62023CN0625

October 12, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/627

15.1.2024

(Case C-625/23, Società agricola Circe)

(C/2024/627)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Società agricola Circe di OL società semplice

Defendants: ST, in his own name and as owner of the sole proprietorship Agricola Case Rosse di ST, Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

Questions referred

1.Must the term ‘scission’ contained in Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 be understood as referring to the legal construct in company law, thus entailing a change in the company resulting in the original property and areas under cultivation of one company being split into two separate properties belonging to different legal entities, or can it be interpreted broadly and thus apply to any contractual legal event that results in the original property and areas under cultivation of the original ‘agricultural’ company being allocated to two different entities, including through the transfer of quotas and the sale of land?

2.According to the correct interpretation to be given to the provisions of Regulation No 1782/2003 (Articles 2, 23, 24, 33, 34, 36, 38, 43 and 44) for the final allocation of CAP certificates, when the single payment is first applied, is it relevant that the area under cultivation and the eligible hectares were reduced in 2002, after the submission of the application by the ‘farmer’ and the provisional allocation of the certificates, if that reduction occurred as a result of the sale of a portion of the land in question in 2002, and the reduction can be applied automatically during the final allocation?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/627/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia