- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-388/18: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0388
62018TB0388
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.3.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/29
(Case T-388/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of request - Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations - Out of time - Excusable error - Inadmissible)
(2020/C 103/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: WV (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of an implied decision of the EEAS, alleged to have been made on 4 September 2017, rejecting the request for assistance lodged by the applicant and, second, the EEAS’ decision of 28 March 2018 dismissing the applicant’s complaint of 29 November 2017 against the implied rejection.
Operative part of the order
1.The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.WV is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.