- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-241/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Repsol (R+) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0241
62024TA0241
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3282
(Case T-241/24)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark R+ - Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Well-known facts - Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3282)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AirPlus International GmbH, formerly Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Repsol, SA (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 February 2024 (Case R 1433/2023-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders AirPlus International GmbH to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3795, 24.6.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3282/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—