- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-406/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 1 July 2021 — A Oy v B Ky and joint heirs of C
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0406
62021CN0406
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.9.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 368/11
(Case C-406/21)
(2021/C 368/09)
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A Oy
Respondents: B Ky and joint heirs of C
Questions referred
1.Is Article 12(4) of Directive 2011/7 to be interpreted as meaning that Member States may exclude from the scope of that directive a contractual practice relating to penalties for late payment which the parties engaged in on a consistent basis in respect of individual orders prior to 16 March 2013, even if the individual orders in respect of which the enforcement of penalties for late payment is sought were placed after that date?
2.If the first question is answered in the negative, is Article 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2011/7 to be interpreted as meaning that the contractual practice described in Question 1 is to be regarded as a contractual term or practice which excludes interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs within the meaning of those provisions?
Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (OJ 2011 L 48, p. 1).