I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-72/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Supervised entity - Composite administrative procedure - Denial of access to the file - Decision 2004/258/EC - Access to ECB documents)
(2023/C 179/37)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Satabank plc (St Julian’s, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: G. Buono, A. Lefterov and E. Koupepidou, acting as Agents)
By its action pursuant to Article 263 TFUE, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 26 November 2019 by which it rejected its request for access to the file concerning it.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 26 November 2019 by which it rejected Satabank plc’s request for access to the file concerning it;
2.Orders the ECB to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.