I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-408/09)
2009/C 312/55
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: ancotel GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Truelsen, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Acotel SpA (Rome, Italy)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 19 June 2009 in Case R 1385/2008 1;
—Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: ancotel
Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘ancotel’ for services in Classes 35 and 38 (Application No 3 314 424)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Acotel SpA
Mark or sign cited in opposition: in particular the Italian figurative mark No 643 751 and the Community figurative mark No 1 442 268‘ACOTEL’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 38
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), since there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).