I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
27.11.2023
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2023/984)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: C. Fürsen and A. Starcke, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Heredero de Navarra, SL (Mendavia, Spain) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 May 2022 (Case R 1462/2021-2).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Aldi GmbH & Co. KG and Heredero de Navarra, SL shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(1) OJ C 389, 10.10.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/984/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)