I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-254/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - EU trade mark that has ceased to exist - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 179/66)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Grzegorz Mordalski (Działoszyn, Poland) (represented by: A. Korbela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Anita Food, SA (Lima, Peru)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 March 2022 (Case R 1616/2021-4).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.