I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-693/14)(1)
((State aid - Sports facilities provided by non-profit organisations - Operating or investment subsidies seeking to enable the construction, operation, maintenance, reconstruction or development of sports facilities which are non-profit - Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Action for annulment - Individual concern - Notion of interested party - Admissibility - No effect on the trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest - No doubts which justify initiating the formal investigation procedure))
(2016/C 232/16)
Language of the case: Czech
Applicant: Hamr — Sport a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Capoušek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil and T. Müller, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C (2014) 3602 final of 11 June 2014 relating to State aid SA.33575 (2013/NN) — Czech Republic in favour of non-profit sports facilities granted by central public institutions.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hamr — Sport a.s. to pay the costs, except those incurred by the Czech Republic.
3.The Czech Republic must be ordered to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.