EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-542/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — ‘Mikrotīkls’ SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 8517 — Subheadings 8517 70 11 and 8517 70 19 — Router aerials)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0542

62021CA0542

October 20, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.12.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/21

(Case C-542/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Heading 8517 - Subheadings 8517 70 11 and 8517 70 19 - Router aerials)

(2022/C 472/25)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: ‘Mikrotīkls’ SIA

Respondent: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Operative part of the judgment

Subheading 8517 70 11 of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the customs and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 254/2000 of 31 January 2000, as that annex has been amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012 and by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013,

must be interpreted as meaning that it does not cover router aerials configured for communication in local area networks (LAN) and/or in wide area networks (WAN).

Language of the case: Latvian

* * *

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia