- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-808/17: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Pethke v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal report — Regularity of appraisal procedures and appraisal appeal procedures — Requirement for the appeal assessor to be impartial)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0808
62017TA0808
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/30
(Case T-808/17) ( (1) )
(Civil service - Officials - Appraisal report - Regularity of appraisal procedures and appraisal appeal procedures - Requirement for the appeal assessor to be impartial)
(2020/C 27/36)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ralph Pethke (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2016 and, if necessary, annulment of the decision by the Management Board of EUIPO of 18 October 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1)Annuls Ralph Pethke’s appraisal report for 2016 and the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 October 2017 rejecting the complaint made by Mr Pethke;
2)Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Pethke.
(1) OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.