I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Eligibility of parcels declared by Sweden - Expenditure incurred in the financial years 2017-2019 - Financial corrections - Key controls - Cross-checks and updating of the land parcel identification system - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment concerning non-compliance of a key control - Proportionality)
(C/2025/2372)
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: H. Shev, F. L. Göransson and C. Meyer-Seitz, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina and P. Carlin, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, O. Serdula and J. Očková, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Kingdom of Sweden, supported by the Czech Republic, seeks the annulment of European Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/908 of 8 June 2022 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2022 L 157, p. 15), in so far as that decision entails a flat-rate correction of 5 %, corresponding to a sum of EUR 13 856 996,64 in respect of aid paid for the 2017 to 2019 claim years.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2372/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—