I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
16.12.2024
(C/2024/7367)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: FW and seven other applicants (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck and F. Patuelli, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the contested decisions;
—recognise the applicants’ entitlement to receive the education allowance for their children who are less than five years old, calculated in accordance with Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations and taking into account the exceptional circumstances concerning them;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
In support of the action against the decisions of the European External Action Service (EEAS) by which it refused to take into account the daycare and education costs borne by the applicants in respect of the education allowance, the applicants rely on four pleas in law; these are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-17/24, UL and Others v EEAS. (1)
* OJ C C/2024/2047.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7367/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
END