I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
4.12.2023
(Case T-516/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark brightblue - Earlier EU word mark BLUE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2023/1157)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Deutsche Glasfaser Wholesale GmbH (Borken, Germany) (represented by: A. Doepner-Thiele and U. Kelp, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: O2 Worldwide Ltd (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (represented by P. Neuwald, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 June 2022 (Case R 24/2022-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Deutsche Glasfaser Wholesale GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by O2 Worldwide Ltd;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1157/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *