- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 January 2025 – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0014
62025CN0014
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2178
22.4.2025
(Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank)
(C/2025/2178)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Thüringer Aufbaubank
Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: LN
Question referred
Is Article 21(2) in conjunction with Article 25 of Regulation No 805/2004 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) to be interpreted as meaning that certification of an enforceable authentic instrument (in this case, an enforceable notarial instrument drawn up by a German notary) as a European Enforcement Order, issued by the competent authority in the Member State of origin using the standard form in Annex III to that regulation, may not be reviewed in the Member State of enforcement even where – having regard to the date on which the authentic instrument was drawn up – the temporal scope of that regulation has manifestly not been respected?
—
(1) Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2178/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—