- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-20/08 and T-21/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Evets v OHIM (DANELECTRO and QWIK TUNE) (Community trade mark — Community word mark DANELECTRO and Community figurative mark QWIK TUNE — Failure to observe the time-limit for submitting a request for renewal of the trade marks — Application for restitutio in integrum — Reformatio in pejus — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Article 61(2), second sentence of Article 73, and Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 63(2), second sentence of Article 75, and Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0020
62008TA0020
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 267/62
(Joined Cases T-20/08 and T-21/08)
(Community trade mark - Community word mark DANELECTRO and Community figurative mark QWIK TUNE - Failure to observe the time-limit for submitting a request for renewal of the trade marks - Application for restitutio in integrum - Reformatio in pejus - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Article 61(2), second sentence of Article 73, and Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 63(2), second sentence of Article 75, and Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 267/110
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Evets Corp. (Irvine, California, United States) (represented by: S. Ryan, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 November 2007 (Cases R 603/2007-4 and R 604/2007-4), relating to an application for restitutio in integrum made by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the actions;
2.Orders Evets Corp. to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.