I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-27/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Non-recognition in national law of the right to a judicial remedy in respect of decisions imposing a financial penalty and the deduction of points for certain breaches of road traffic regulations - Purely internal situation - Inadmissibility of the reference)
2012/C 217/05
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Applicant: Anton Vinkov
Defendant: Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Interpretation of Article 82(1)(a) TFEU and Article 91(1)(c) TFEU and Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ 2005 L 76, p. 16) — Interpretation of Articles 47, 48 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Compatibility with EU law of national rules excluding the right to bring an action before a court challenging decisions relating to financial penalties following administrative offences in road traffic cases amounting to BGN 50
The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria), made by decision of 27 December 2010 (Case C-27/11), is inadmissible.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.