I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-35/11)
2011/C 211/67
Language of the case: Slovak
Applicant(s): ZZ (represented by: J. Rybánsky, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Annulment of the decision of the defendant to grant the applicant only half of the installation allowance to which he should be entitled.
—Annul the decision of the European Parliament (Individual Entitlements Unit) of 28 May 2010 on the grant of the installation allowance to the applicant in so far as it fixes the installation allowance at only one month’s basic salary and does not grant an installation allowance of two months’ basic salary;
—Annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 6 January 2011 which rejects the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;
—Order the Parliament to pay the costs.