- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-532/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj v SC Westside Unicat
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0532
62022CN0532
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 451/10
(Case C-532/22)
(2022/C 451/13)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj
Defendant: SC Westside Unicat
Questions referred
1.Is Article 53 of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as applying to services of the type at issue in this dispute, which is to say services provided by a video chat studio to a website operator, consisting in interactive sessions of an erotic nature filmed and transmitted in real [time] via the Internet (live streaming of digital content)?
2.In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, then, for the purposes of interpreting the phrase ‘the place where those events actually take place’, appearing in Article 53 of the VAT Directive, is the place where the performers appear in front of the webcam relevant, or the place where the organiser of the sessions is established, or the place where customers see the images, or should some other place be taken into account?
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Language of the case: Romanian
* * *