- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-752/24, Jangielak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 30 October 2024 – mBank S.A. v KŁ and JŁ
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0752
62024CN0752
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/532
(Case C-752/24, Jangielak)
(C/2025/532)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Party initiating the proceedings before the referring court: mBank S.A.
Other parties to the proceedings: KŁ and JŁ
Question referred
Must Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, and the principles of effectiveness, proportionality, legal certainty and of the right of access to a court or tribunal, be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which the limitation period for a seller or supplier’s claim against a consumer for the return of undue payments under the contract, which has become null and void because it contains unfair terms, is interrupted by an action for payment brought by the bank before the definitive conclusion of proceedings brought earlier by the consumer for a declaration that the loan contract is null and void?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/532/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Polish.