- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-273/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék — Hungary) — WD v Agrárminiszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Agriculture — Common Agricultural Policy — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Direct support schemes — Article 4(1)(c) and (e) — Article 32(2) — Single area payment application — Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ — Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register — Actual use for agricultural purposes)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CB0273
62021CB0273
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.2.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/5
(Case C-273/21) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agriculture - Common Agricultural Policy - Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Direct support schemes - Article 4(1)(c) and (e) - Article 32(2) - Single area payment application - Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ - Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register - Actual use for agricultural purposes)
(2022/C 95/07)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: WD
Defendant: Agrárminiszter
Operative part of the order
Article 4(1)(c) and (e) and Article 32(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that an area classified, under national law, as an aerodrome, but on which no activity relating to an aerodrome is carried out, must be classified as an agricultural area used for agricultural purposes since it is in fact used as permanent pasture for livestock
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.