- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-522/21: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — XH v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file — Decision not to promote the applicant — Time limits for lodging an appeal — Public policy nature — Starting point — Application for legal aid — Suspension of time limits — Computation of time limits — Lateness — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0522
62021TB0522
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/47
(Case T-522/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2020 promotion exercise - Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file - Decision not to promote the applicant - Time limits for lodging an appeal - Public policy nature - Starting point - Application for legal aid - Suspension of time limits - Computation of time limits - Lateness - Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure - Excusable error - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 63/61)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny-Salwarowska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff, L. Hohenecker and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 24 November 2020 refusing to amend her Sysper 2 file, confirmed by decision of 16 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, secondly, annulment of the decision of the Commission of 12 November 2020 not to include her name on the list of officials promoted in 2020, confirmed by decision of 8 June 2021 rejecting her complaint, and, thirdly, compensation for the damage suffered.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.XH is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.