- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-749/22: Action brought on 29 November 2022 — Parliament v Union Technique du Bâtiment and Argest
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0749
62022TN0749
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/80
(Case T-749/22)
(2023/C 24/107)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Kazek and K. Wójcik, acting as Agents, and by N. Charrel, T. Gaspar and M. Jolly, lawyers)
Defendants: Union Technique du Bâtiment SA (Romainville, France) and Argest SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—order the companies Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA jointly and severally to pay it a total sum of EUR 161 200, together with statutory interest accruing from the date on which the present application was filed, capitalised to produce interest itself;
—order the defendants to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that it has a right to compensation under the ten-year warranty provided by the companies Union Technique du Bâtiment SA and Argest SA for defects discovered to be affecting the thatched roof of Maison Jean Monnet in Bazoches-sur-Guyonne.