I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2009/C 267/49
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Premis Medical BV
Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, kantoor Rotterdam Laan op Zuid
1.Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 (1) of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, valid in the sense that the annex contained in the corrigendum is the valid annex? If so:
2.Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, invalid on the ground that the Commission has restricted the scope of heading 9021 in that regulation? If the regulation is valid:
3.Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, invalid on the ground that the Commission has incorrectly classified the rollator in the CN?
(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2004 L 113, p. 5).