I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 292/66
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Seven for all mankind LLC (Vernon, United States) (represented by: A. Gautier-Sauvagnac, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 April 2014 given in Case R 1277/2013-1;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND’ for goods in Classes 14 and 18 — Community trade mark application No 4 4 43 222
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative Community trademarks containing the verbal element ‘Seven’
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Accepted the appeal in part
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.