EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-88/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — Regionų apygardos administracinio teismo Kauno rūmai (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) — Decision 2007/533/JHA — Alert on an object sought — Article 38 — Objectives of the alert — Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings — Article 39 — Execution of the action based on an alert — Measures taken in accordance with the national law of the Member States — National legislation laying down an obligation to prohibit the registration of vehicles which are the subject of alerts in SIS II)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0088

62021CA0088

December 15, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.2.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/8

(Case C-88/21)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) - Decision 2007/533/JHA - Alert on an object sought - Article 38 - Objectives of the alert - Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings - Article 39 - Execution of the action based on an alert - Measures taken in accordance with the national law of the Member States - National legislation laying down an obligation to prohibit the registration of vehicles which are the subject of alerts in SIS II)

(2023/C 54/08)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Regionų apygardos administracinio teismo Kauno rūmai

Intervener: Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerija

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), read in conjunction with Article 38(1) of that decision,

must be interpreted as meaning that:

it does not lay down any general obligation to prohibit the registration of a motor vehicle which is the subject of an ongoing alert in the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II);

it does not require the executing Member State to provide for general rules prohibiting actions relating to the object which has been located, other than those which enable the objectives of Article 38(1) of that decision to be achieved;

it does not preclude that Member State from providing for derogations from a general prohibition on registering such a vehicle.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia