- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 30 September 2010.#Jean-François Vivier v European Commission.#Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Classification in grade — Grades laid down in the call for applications — Amendment of the rules governing classification of staff — Transitional provisions — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Application by analogy.#Case F-29/05.
ECLI:EU:F:2010:114
62005FJ0029
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Reports of Cases
(Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Classification in grade — Grades laid down in the call for applications — Amendment of the rules governing classification of staff — Transitional provisions — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Application by analogy)
Application: brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Vivier seeks annulment of the Commission’s decision of 21 July 2004 classifying him at grade A*6.
Held: The Commission’s classification decision as annexed to the amendment of 21 July 2004 to the temporary staff contract signed by the applicant on 10 June 2004 is annulled. The Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant.
Summary
EN ECLI:EU:F:2010:114
SUMMARY — CASE F-29/05 VIVIER v COMMISSION
(see para. 32)
See: T-495/04 Belfass v Council [2008] ECR II-781, para. 87
Where there are no permanent provisions, however, the administration may apply Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations by analogy without disregarding its transitional nature.
(see paras 67-70)
See: 77/82 Peskeloglou [1983] ECR 1085, paras 11 to 15; C-267/95 and C-268/95 Merck and Beecham [1996] ECR I-6285, paras 23 and 24; C-240/05 Eurodental [2006] ECR I-11479, paras 52 to 54; C-462/05 Commission v Portugal [2008] ECR I-4183, paras 53 and 54
T-252/97 Dürbeck v Commission [2000] ECR II-3031, paras 66 and 70
It follows from Article 10 of the Conditions of Employment that the administration has discretion to determine the grade of members of the temporary staff. In the absence of any internal provision on the subject, that discretion is circumscribed solely by the obligation to employ those staff in the grade announced in the call for applications and by the need to adhere to the structure of the categories or function groups laid down in Article 5(1) to (4) of the Staff Regulations.
That being so, and where the grade announced in the call for applications has been repealed, an institution may reasonably be guided by the solution adopted by the Community legislature when adopting Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and apply by analogy Article 12(3) of that annex, which relates to the classification of officials included in a list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 and recruited between 1 May 2004 and 30 April 2006.
(see paras 60, 64, 65, 69, 70, 72)
See: F-21/06 Da Silva v Commission [2007] ECR-SC I-A-1-179 and II-A-1-981, paras 64, 68 and 79
ECLI:EU:F:2010:114