- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-457/17: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2018 — Medisana v EUIPO (happy life) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark happy life — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0457
62017TA0457
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.11.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/54
(Case T-457/17) (*)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark happy life - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 408/69)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Medisana AG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Söder and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2017 (Case R 1965/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign happy life as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Medisana AG to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.
ECLI:EU:C:2018:140