I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3859)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: UF
Defendant: Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres)
The request for a preliminary ruling lodged by the Tribunal du travail du Brabant wallon – Division Nivelles (Belgium), by decision of 8 April 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/5210.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3859/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—