I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2012/C 331/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela, J. Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apro Tech Co., Ltd (Taichung Hsien, Taiwan)
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 May 2012 in Case R 196/2011-2, declaring that, pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, the opponent’s action before OHIM should have been upheld and the decision of the Opposition Division granting Community trade mark No 8 253 551‘APRO’ (mixed) in full should have been annulled;
—order the defendant and the other party opposing this action to pay the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Apro Tech Co., Ltd
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘APRO’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 8 253 551
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: national and Community figurative mark ‘B-PRO by Boomerang’ and Community word marks ‘PRO MOUNTAIN’ and ‘PRO OUTDOOR’ for goods in Class 12
Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009