I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Law governing the institutions - European citizen’s initiative - Cohesion policy - National minority regions - Registration decision - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Admissibility - Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2022/C 11/29)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane, R. Haţieganu, L. Liţu and L.-E. Baţagoi, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Stancu, I. Martínez del Peral and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, M. Tátrai and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/721 of 30 April 2019 on the proposed citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ (OJ 2019 L 122, p. 55).
The General Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Romania to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.