I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case F-11/16)
(2016/C 145/50)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Lhoest, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer to the European Parliament and to reconstruct her career and an order that the Commission pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration paid to her and that which ought to be paid to her after the reconstruction of her career, together with interest for late payment.
—Annul the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2015 refusing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer and to review her career at the European Commission from 16 June 2001 to 31 December 2010, despite the promotion from grade C4 (now AST 3) to grade C3 (now AST 4) granted to her by the European Parliament on 7 August 2009 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2000;
—Annul the decision of the European Commission of 9 November 2015 rejecting the claim made by the applicant on 17 July 2015;
—Order the European Commission to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration which it paid to her and the remuneration which ought to be paid to her following the reconstruction of her career in grade and step, together with interest for late payment;
—Order the European Commission to pay the costs.