I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 303/70)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Shulgin (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, F. Bélot, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision 2022/582/CFSP of 8 April 2022, (1) in so far as it includes the applicant’s name at No 911 of the annex to that decision;
—annul the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022, (2) in so far as it includes the applicant’s name at No 911 of Annex I to that regulation;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection and of the obligation to give reasons.
2.Second plea, alleging manifest error of assessment as regards the grounds given by the Council.
3.Third plea, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and infringement of fundamental rights.
4.Fourth plea, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3).