I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/3064)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Broomfield, Colorado, United States) (represented by: H. Haouideg, J. Guise, M. Berger and N. Hadjadj Cazier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gor Factory, SA (Fortuna, Spain)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: EU design Footwear – EU design No 257 001-0001
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2025 in Case R 590/2024-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the contested decision to find that the contested registered EU design does produce a different overall impression in comparison to the prior design, allow the applicant’s appeal and reverse the decision of the Invalidity Division;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision on the grounds that the Office erred in finding that the contested registered EU design does not produce a different overall impression to the prior design and remit the case back to the Office for further consideration;
—make an award of costs in favour of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3064/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—