- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-198/13: Order of the General Court of 3 February 2014 — Imax v OHIM — Himax Technologies (IMAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0198
62013TB0198
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.5.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/35
(Case T-198/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 142/45
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Imax Corporation (Mississauga, Canada) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, lawyer, and K. Hughes, solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Himax Technologies, Inc. (Hsinhua, Taiwan)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 January 2013 (Case R 740/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Himax Technologies, Inc. and Imax Corporation.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The parties shall bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 171, 15.6.13.
* * *
Language of the case: English