- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-13/15: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 September 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against Cdiscount SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Directive 2005/29/EC — Consumer protection — Unfair commercial practices — Price reduction — Marking or display of reference price)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CB0013
62015CB0013
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 398/9
(Case C-13/15)(1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Directive 2005/29/EC - Consumer protection - Unfair commercial practices - Price reduction - Marking or display of reference price))
(2015/C 398/11)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Operative part of the order
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as precluding provisions of national law, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which lay down a general prohibition of announcements of price reductions which do not show the reference price when the price is marked or displayed, without providing for an assessment case by case allowing it to be determined whether the announcements are unfair, in so far as those provisions pursue objectives relating to consumer protection. It is for the referring court to determine whether that is so in the case in the main proceedings.
*
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1)
OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.